More batter density = more value, right? Not so fast.

In this episode, we challenge the hype around energy storage density—and reveal what really drives value for battery storage assets.

"Density alone does not equate value." - Neha Sinha

At RE+ 2025, Nico Johnson got to connect with two powerhouse product leaders from Wärtsilä Energy Storage: Neha Sinha, Head of Hardware Portfolio, and Ruchira Shah, Lead for Software Product Management. Together, they’re crystal clear about how hardware and software integration impacts performance, revenue, and long-term viability in energy storage projects. And how that translates to strategic value for battery operators.

If you think “more megawatt-hours per box” is the endgame, you might be oversizing your system—and leaving cash on the table. Neha and Ruchira explain why “usable energy,” not just nameplate capacity, is the real metric investors should care about. And why that’s not solely defined by  the MWH you can stuff inside a container.

Expect to learn:

🔹 Why density ≠ value (and when high-density enclosures actually hurt your ROI)
🔹 How software helps unlock stranded energy and accurate bidding
🔹 The surprising role of chillers in degradation—and how to optimize them
🔹 How to navigate site constraints, noise ordinances, and permitting barriers

If you're bidding into markets or scaling storage assets, this episode is your wake-up call: performance, not just packaging, determines profits.

RESOURCES:

Connect with Neha Sinha:

• LinkedIn

Connect with Ruchira Shah:

• LinkedIn

Check out Wärtsilä Energy Storage:

• ‍Website | LinkedIn | X | Facebook | Instagram | YouTube

"You’re essentially creating a buffer... maybe only bidding 80 megawatt hours. So that’s 20 megawatt hours that you’ve paid for that is effectively stranded." - Ruchira Shah